Why Out Astronaut: Raisons D’être

1. Visibility and Human Performance

To date, no spacefarer has openly identified with the LGBTQ community. We know of at least one nonheterosexual astronaut—a celebrated and influential heroine—who never benefitted from the LGBTQ-tolerant environments we are fighting for today. In the workforce, “coming out” can be a lifelong process. Disclosing one’s identity is associated with better mental health, but with no visible support around them, many find this unachievable.4 For example, an estimated 50% of physics employees remain “in the closet” at work.10 Visibility and support can also enhance human performance by protecting workers from burnout and internalized stigma.15 Who will be history’s first out astronaut?

2. Public Figures and Role Models

We are not yet to a point of universal acceptance.

—Robert Pearlman on LGBTQ Identity at NASA, 2012


The LGBTQ community is underrepresented in science, and virtually unrepresented in spaceflight.16 Positive role models are essential for motivating LGBTQ youth, but Out Astronaut’s goals reach higher than empowering LGBTQ scientists to become spacefaring ambassadors for STEM; it’s about emboldening the global LGBTQ community.16,18 LGBTQ contributions to human spaceflight have been all but invisible, but the world’s first out astronaut could set a precedent for change.2,29 The public discourse they would inspire could help drive policy changes to protect the civil rights of LGBTQ individuals, which in turn stimulates acceptance in society.

3. Benefits of Diversity and Inclusion

Logically, any discipline would benefit from attracting and retaining all the talent it can—not putting up arbitrary barriers.10,21,23 Furthermore, diversity specifically enhances human performance. Some of the world’s most successful militaries have cited that diversity improves troops’ readiness and performance.21 Having different perspectives tends to lead teams to more creative solutions, so diverse teams are more likely to reach scientific breakthroughs and technological innovations.16,17 Unfortunately, STEM fields have significantly lower retention rates for LGBTQ students, with one important exception: students who feel like they can personally contribute to their field develop a “STEM identity” are even more likely to stick with it than their cis-heterosexual peers.10,16 An LGBTQ-identifying astronaut–ambassador could be more than just a role model for LGBTQ youth to emulate, but an actual role toward which they could realistically aspire.

4. Intercultural Competence

There’s no doubt: space exploration is a global endeavor. One of the biggest considerations for long-duration spaceflight is that spacefarers will need to be fluent in cross-cultural interactions, capable of working alongside people with different backgrounds, ethnicities, and beliefs.2,7,29 Including diverse perspectives in the workforce isn’t just good for team performance; it broadens the members’ capacity for compassion, adding another dimension of cultural competence.17 Furthermore, international collaboration is a critical ingredient for pushing the boundaries of human knowledge across all disciplines.27 We have to be mindful that LGBTQ culture and policies vary from place to place, and out astronauts could serve as a beacon for LGBTQ rights advocates worldwide.

5. Explicit and Implicit Bias

Outright discrimination is very much alive today; 20% of lesbian, gay, and bisexual physicists reported outright exclusionary behavior at work, as well as 49% of their transgendered colleagues.10 Studies suggest that interacting with real LGBTQ folks can actively reduce people’s implicit biases.6 The first out astronaut will be a positive example for changing society’s explicit biases, and the pride they’ll inspire in the LGBTQ community will ripple even further.

6. Social Stigma and Health

Not only are young LGBTQ scientists less likely to remain in STEM than their cis-heterosexual peers, but (like all LGBTQ folks) they are also vulnerable to well-established health risks resulting from their minority status.18,24 Eliminating the stigma associated with LGBTQ status will directly eliminate many negative health outcomes.28 What better way to combat stigma than by proudly reaching for the stars?

7. Social Science and Biology

With or without Out Astronaut, whether or not they’ll have to fly under the radar, more sexual and gender minorities will be flying in space in the near future. Survey respondents indicate that 3.5% of the USA’s population identifies as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and 0.6% as transgender, with 7.5% of others reporting nonheterosexual behavior.11,13 On top of sheer numbers, being LGBTQ may be associated with factors that stimulate an interest spaceflight, or even certain aptitudes like resilience—a quality favoring astronaut candidacy.9,14,23,26 As such, sexual health in space and other logistical considerations should be taken seriously, especially with the approach of longer-duration missions and space tourism.17,22,27,30 So far, there is a total knowledge gap regarding the biology and health of sexual and gender minorities in spaceflight, but if we created a tolerant environment for LGBTQ astronauts, they could disclose their demographics, and researchers could begin collecting valuable data to benefit both future spacefarers and the field of human sexuality at large.9,20,22 Having a firmer understanding of the biology behind human nature was an important step in reducing the stigma of mental health conditions.28 This is an analogous situation, especially considering that being transgender was officially considered a mental disorder all the way until 2013.15 The first out astronaut would counteract negative stereotypes on their own while also setting the stage for population health research involving future LGBTQ spacefarers.

8. Terrestrial Applications

Success in space has a profound impact on life on Earth. From global positioning systems to NASA spinoff technologies, the space industry has revolutionized the human experience. Many of these discoveries have improved human health and performance, like medical devices and behavioral models.8 It is in everyone’s best interest to harness the synergy of a diverse and inclusive workforce in spaceflight. This not only enhances team performance, but also allows them to make new discoveries that are more relevant for the general public.

9. Institutional Prejudice and Military History

Throughout our time as a spacefaring species, the space industry has grown along a military trellis, with a checkered history of LGBTQ discrimination. From the former Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell policy to the current ban against transgender servicemembers, USA military regulations have mounted hostile positions against sexual and gender minorities.12,19,23 This kind of injustice trickles down through institutions and ultimately stains the fabric of society.1 The silver lining is that interindividual support can still flourish among servicemembers themselves, and military providers express a general willingness to learn how to support their LGBTQ peers more effectively.20,24,25 Discriminatory spaceflight restrictions have specifically targeted candidates who engage in same-sex sexual behavior or are transgender.3,5 Today, the space industry shouldn’t need to mirror the ebbs and flows of military politics; with modern advancements in science and technology, an upsurge of international collaboration in aerospace, and the rise of private space companies, now is the time to forge a more open-minded culture in astronautics.

10. Equity and Equality

Bridging LGBTQ underrepresentation in STEM is a complex problem that demands thoughtful social reform. In practice, legal protections for LGBTQ workers are unevenly enforced; official legislation is not enough to bring equity to the LGBTQ community.10 For example, agency-trained astronauts receive comprehensive family support, but what if an LGBTQ astronaut feels unable to disclose whom they love? To achieve real progress, societies must be open to welcoming us. Out Astronaut wants the world to see that LGBTQ scientists are just as capable and deserving of the opportunity to advance human knowledge. Our goals echo the past:


We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win, and the others, too.

—John F. Kennedy on Space Efforts in the USA, 1962



  1. Associated Press. “Military Academies Begin to Follow Military Transgender Ban.” Washington Post, April 18, 2019. https://apnews.com/acbff2fdaf6e48819ccbc4bcccea2180.
  2. Bell, Suzanne T., Shanique G. Brown, Daniel R. Abben, and Neal B. Outland. “Team Composition Issues for Future Space Exploration: A Review and Directions for Future Research.” Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance 86, no. 6 (June 1, 2015): 548–56. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4195.2015.
  3. Bogolomov, VV, et al. “‘International Space Station Medical Standards and Certification for Space Flight Participants.’” Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 2009. https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.2175.2007.
  4. Boroughs, Michael S., C. Andres Bedoya, Conall O’Cleirigh, and Steven A. Safren. “Toward Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating LGBT Cultural Competence for Psychologists.” Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 22, no. 2 (June 2015): 151–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12098.
  5. Brown H.J. (1966). An A.M.E. ‘s Evaluation of Pilot Fitness to Fly. Clinical Aviation and Aerospace Medicine 37(1):59-66.
  6. Burke, Sara E., John F. Dovidio, Julia M. Przedworski, Rachel R. Hardeman, Sylvia P. Perry, Sean M. Phelan, David B. Nelson, Diana J. Burgess, Mark W. Yeazel, and Michelle van Ryn. “Do Contact and Empathy Mitigate Bias Against Gay and Lesbian People Among Heterosexual First-Year Medical Students? A Report From the Medical Student CHANGE Study:” Academic Medicine 90, no. 5 (May 2015): 645–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000661.
  7. Corneliussen, Jesper G., Gloria R. Leon, Anders Kjærgaard, Birgit A. Fink, and Noah C. Venabls. “Individual Traits, Personal Values, and Conflict Resolution in an Isolated, Confined, Extreme Environment.” Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance 88, no. 6 (June 1, 2017): 535–43. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4785.2017.
  8. Crucian, Brian, Adriana Babiak-Vazquez, Smith Johnston, Duane Pierson, C Mark Ott, and Clarence Sams. “Incidence of Clinical Symptoms during Long-Duration Orbital Spaceflight.” International Journal of General Medicine Volume 9 (November 2016): 383–91. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S114188.
  9. Endler, Norman S. “The Joint Effects of Person and Situation Factors on Stress in Spaceflight” 75, no. 7 (2004): 6.
  10. Falk, Dr Michael L. “Membership of the Ad-Hoc Committee on LGBT Issues,” APS Physics, 52 (March 2016).
  11. Flores, A.R., Herman, J.L., Gates, G.J., & Brown, T.N.T. (2016). How Many Adults Identify as Transgender in the United States? Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.
  12. Gates, Gary J, and Jody L Herman. 2014. “Transgender Military Service in the United States,” UCLA Williams Institute.
  13. Gates, Gary J. “How Many People Are Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender?,” Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Williams Institute, April 2011.
  14. Goel, Namni, Tracy L. Bale, C. Neill Epperson, Susan G. Kornstein, Gloria R. Leon, Lawrence A. Palinkas, Jack W. Stuster, and David F. Dinges. “Effects of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space: Behavioral Health.” Journal of Women’s Health 23, no. 11 (November 2014): 975–86. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.4911.
  15. Hollenbach, A.D., Eckstrand, K.L., Dreger, A. (Eds.). (2014). Implementing Curricular and Institutional Climate Changes to Improve Health Care for Individuals Who Are LGBT, Gender Nonconforming, or Born with DSD: A Resource for Medical Educators. Association of American Medical Colleges. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Executive%20LGBT%20FINAL.pdf.
  16. Hughes, Bryce E. “Coming out in STEM: Factors Affecting Retention of Sexual Minority STEM Students.” Science Advances 4, no. 3 (March 2018): eaao6373. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao6373.
  17. Landon, Lauren Blackwell, Christina Rokholt, Kelley J. Slack, and Yvonne Pecena. “Selecting Astronauts for Long-Duration Exploration Missions: Considerations for Team Performance and Functioning.” REACH 5 (March 2017): 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reach.2017.03.002.
  18. O’Hanlan, Katherine A., Jennifer C. Gordon, and Mackenzie W. Sullivan. “Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity: Impact on Health.” Gynecologic Oncology 149, no. 1 (April 2018): 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.014.
  19. Ortega, Shane. “The Modern Revolution: Transgender Military Rights,” USC Suzanne Gworak-Peck School of Social Work, 28 August 2018.
  20. Rerucha, Caitlyn M., Lloyd A. Runser, Juliana S. Ee, and Elizabeth G. Hersey. “Military Healthcare Providers’ Knowledge and Comfort Regarding the Medical Care of Active Duty Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Patients.” LGBT Health 5, no. 1 (January 2018): 86–90. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2016.0210.
  21. Schaefer, Agnes, Radha Iyengar, Srikanth Kadiyala, Jennifer Kavanagh, Charles Engel, Kayla Williams, and Amii Kress. Assessing the Implications of Allowing Transgender Personnel to Serve Openly. RAND Corporation, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7249/RR1530.
  22. Schmidt, Michael A., and Thomas J. Goodwin. “Personalized Medicine in Human Space Flight: Using Omics Based Analyses to Develop Individualized Countermeasures That Enhance Astronaut Safety and Performance.” Metabolomics 9, no. 6 (December 2013): 1134–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-013-0556-3.
  23. Secretary of Defense. “DoD Transgender Policy Changes: New Policy Will End Ban on Transgender Americans in the United States Military,” US Department of Defense, 30 June 2016.
  24. Shrader, Angela, Kellie Casero, Bethany Casper, Mary Kelley, Laura Lewis, and Jess Calohan. “Military Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Awareness Training for Health Care Providers Within the Military Health System.” Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 23, no. 6 (November 2017): 385–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390317711768.
  25. Smerconish, Michael. “Despite Trump tweets, Pa. Surgeon Treats Transgender People in the Military,” Philadelphia Inquirer, 15 November 2017.
  26. Smith, N., G.M. Sandal, G.R. Leon, and A. Kjærgaard. “Examining Personal Values in Extreme Environment Contexts: Revisiting the Question of Generalizability.” Acta Astronautica 137 (August 2017): 138–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.008.
  27. Stepanek, Jan, Rebecca S. Blue, and Scott Parazynski. “Space Medicine in the Era of Civilian Spaceflight.” Edited by Dan L. Longo. New England Journal of Medicine 380, no. 11 (March 14, 2019): 1053–60. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1609012.
  28. Stuart H. (2016). Reducing the stigma of mental illness. Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 3, e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2016.11.
  29. Vinokhodova, A.G., and V.I. Gushin. “Study of Values and Interpersonal Perception in Cosmonauts on Board of International Space Station.” Acta Astronautica 93 (January 2014): 359–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.026.
  30. Woodmansee, Laura S. Sex in Space. Burlington, Ont., Canada: CG Publishing, Inc, 2006.